land for seagypsies: October 2012

Bangkok post 2012 11 11

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Extracts from BANGKOK POST Sea Gypsy article published 11^th November 2012

The Community Network for Political and Social Reform, which encompasses ethnic groups nationwide, says there are 41 sea gypsy communities on the Andaman's shores with an estimated population of 17,400, and they are suffering under the conservation regulations, especially those of the National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department.

( sea gypsies protesting for human rights in Bangkok )

It was a little more than 20 years ago that things started to change. One day Nui sailed to Koh Surin, where he was told by officials that he could not fish in the shallow waters any more because it was now a national park. If he insisted on fishing there, he would be arrested.

According to the Community Network for Political and Social Reform, 28 out of 41 sea gypsy communities face the threat of having their land seized, and it is almost impossible for them to stop it because those doing the land grabbing hold land right documents.

( Sea Gypsies protesting for human rights in Bangkok )

At Rawai beach, at least 10 sea gypsy families are being sued by private land owners. Nui's family is one of them, and he has vowed to fight to the end to keep the land he lives on, just as his ancestors did.

At Koh Phi Phi, a few hotels have already been built on sea gypsy cemeteries and at Lan Ta in Krabi province, the sea gypsies are being told to remove their loved ones' remains from Bor Nae cemetery or see them destroyed by land developers.

Maitree Jongkraijak, a leading member of the Community Network for Political and Social Reform, said the problems of the sea gypsies have grown over time and first received widespread public attention following the 2004 tsunami, which destroyed their homes and saw their ancestral land subject to land grabs.

``Sea gypsies do not have the concept of occupying and possessing things or land, and that is one reason why they have problems fighting claims to their land,'' said Mr Maitree.

``But what is clear in their case is that the present administration and regulations are very fixed and narrow -they do not embrace those who have different lifestyles, especially traditional ones that may be out of the context of the present administration and regulations. They just do not embrace diverse cultures and societies.''

Narumon Arunotai, a lead researcher at Chulalongkorn University's Social Research Institute, and vice-chairwoman of a subcommittee following up the progress of the cabinet resolution, said the principal problem concerning sea gypsies may be the public prejudice against them.

Ms Narumon agreed with Mr Maitree that sea gypsies have very different values and lifestyles. This has been reflected in land conflicts. Most people think of land as being owned by individuals, while sea gypsies think of it as communal. In fact, they hardly have a concept of possession, which is in keeping with the sufficiency economy theory.

Instead of learning from them, people view them as strange and try to compel them to become part of ``normal'' society.

Ms Narumon said such attitudes are wrong and people need to be more open to different cultures and a more diverse society.

The cabinet resolution, she said, is progress, since it acknowledges the sea gypsies' problems, which have at least been addressed at a policy level. Implementation is what is required now, she said.

``At least the cabinet resolution has shown that there is room to embrace others, although it may mean the creation of a special cultural zone to facilitate it,'' said Ms Narumon. ``I call it progress as it embraces the principle of coexistence. We live in the same world, so we must acknowledge others, not marginalise them.''

For all to see.........

..............the Rawai sea gypsies truth.

Part 1

Double click to go full screen

Part 2

Double click to go full screen

Stacey Dooley, where are you now ?

The Sea Gypsies versus the House of Shame

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

The Rawai Sea Gypsies have lived – uncontested – at their current beachfront location for at least three generation and probably much more.

It would appear that most of the problems for the Sea Gypsies and other poor minority groups, began following the 2004 Tsunami. Maybe unscrupulous business people along with corrupt land officials taking advantage of the Tsunami’s ensuing chaos.

They have already lost a large portion of their land east of the village, (edged in yellow in map below) to a businessman who claimed ownership of the land. Having taken the land from the Sea Gypsies, he is now the proud owner of a derelict, unfinished, unoccupied building, whilst the Sea Gypsies are forced into an ever decreasing area to live, amounting to just 5% of the land they once occupied.

To make matters worse, the businessman claiming ownership of the land, (marked in yellow) is in debt to his bank, using the land and unfinished buildings as collateral. The bank now has possession of the title deeds and has put the land and buildings up for sale.

The Rawai Sea Gypsies are not the only ones on Phuket fighting for their land.

Latest reports from our local newspapers show………

Some 2,000 families on Soi Kingkaew, in Rassada, were recently confronted with a similar threat to that of the Rawai Sea Gypsies.

Two other communities with PMOVE ( Peoples Movement ) membership fighting similar battles on the island include the "Community Behind Rama IX Park" in Phuket Town and the "Khok Tanode Community" in Chalong.

And just recently……

23 Villagers of Koh Racha Yai, Who have lived and worked on the island for generations, want to know why their request for land deeds was denied when similar requests on Koh Racha Yai, made by outside investors, were granted.

At the end of the day it would appear that it all comes down to what happens behind these gates:

( house of Shame )

In 2003, Pongtorn Hiranyaburana, the Deputy Chief of the Phuket Provincial Land Titles Office, who was in the process of investigating the issuing of illegal land titles, was shot dead as he drove home from Phuket to Surat Thani.

His murderers were never found.

Recently, The National Anti-Corruption Commission has been asked to investigate the alleged involvement of a former Phuket Deputy Governor and a former Interior Permanent Secretary over unlawful land acquisitions on the island. Over 200 plots of land are currently being investigated.

Major General Dusadee Arayawuthi who is leading the investigation says he and his staff have been threatened several times since they began their enquiries.

The investigation of course revolves around Phuket Land Office and will no doubt move to higher departments if the enquiry is allowed to continue.

In March 2012, the Chief of the Land Office declared that he ‘welcomed the investigations, as a deterrent against future abuses’.

‘future abuses’ is little consolation for those affected by past corruption.

Are these poor people just victims of high ranking crooks and criminals, through

deception and corruption within Government Offices?

Surely, it isn’t too much to ask, that those involved in wrong doings are held responsible.

For the Sea Gypsies of Rawai, a full investigation should take place on all land east of Rawai Pier, with particular reference to land title deeds issued in 1970 and 1971.

The Sea Gypsies of Rawai, number over 2000 residents and are just a part of the 10,000 Sea Gypsies estimated to be living in Phuket and around the Andaman Sea.

Their human rights have been ignored for long enough.

Does Thailand, soon to entering the Asean Treaty, wish to be

compared with Myanmar in their treatment of human rights?

There are so many positives could come from the Sea Gypsy issue:

The Government could be seen to be helping them by ensuring they have Government water, individual electricity supply and adequate drainage and sewage facilities.

The ‘questionable’ land, east of the village, should be returned to the Sea Gypsies.

The land currently occupied by the Sea Gypsies along with the ‘questionable’ land, should be allocated officially as Sea Gypsy land under the Community Chanote scheme, created under the former Democrat government of Abhisit Vejjajiva. It allows communities to live on the land and use it for agriculture, but does not allow the land to be sold.

The trades and handicrafts of the Sea Gypsies should be encouraged, as it is a unique heritage and in danger of disappearing.

The entire area could be proposed as a UNESCO heritage site, under sections,

(iii) to bear a unique or at least exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilization which is living or which has disappeared.

(vi) to be an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement, land-use, or sea-use which is representative of a culture (or cultures), or human interaction with the environment especially when it has become vulnerable under the impact of irreversible change.

Post Script: For whatever misdemeanors have taken place in the past, there is an opportunity here for the Government to resolve the situation, by re-claiming the waterfront land (edged in yellow) and returning it, along with their present domicile to the Sea Gypsy Community, (under the Community Chanote Scheme) declaring the entire gypsy land for sea gypsy use in pursuance of their unique way of life.

We appeal to our Government, our Land Officials and to our friends in Thailand and beyond to give a thought to and help the Sea Gypsies (Moken), before it’s too late.